TYREE'S TIRADES: Tucson Overreaction — Putting Wimpiness In Crosshairs

Comment   Email   Print
Related Articles
What a party that must have been!

I’m speaking of the time that Lee Harvey Oswald, John Wilkes Booth and James Earl Ray hopped into their Hot Tub Time Machine and journeyed to 2011 to listen to Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh and get brainwashed into entering the assassination game.

That scenario is not so far-fetched for those who are rushing to declare the recent Tucson shooting rampage the fault of (take your pick) the Tea Party, conservative talk radio, FOX News or negative campaign ads.

Suddenly “civility” groupies are bemoaning “vitriolic rhetoric,” “hate,” “anger,” “bitterness,” “rancor,” “extreme ideologies” and “verbal savagery.”

I agree that politicians, commentators and voters should be ashamed of rumor-mongering, deliberate distortions of the truth, and knee-jerk auto-pilot opposition to everything the other party proposes – but beyond that, we do a disservice to our forefathers if we insist on playing the child-pacifying game “Tiptoe, Tiptoe, Quiet As A Mouse” around so-called hot button issues.

Is political discourse in 2011 something unique in history?

Returning Vietnam War veterans were taunted as “baby killers.”

An infamous 1964 campaign commercial strongly implied that challenger Barry Goldwater would plunge us into nuclear war.

The Copperheads thought Abe Lincoln a bloodthirsty tyrant.

One of Thomas Jefferson’s supporters branded John Adams “a hideously hermaphroditic character.”

Since 1776 this republic has survived with the option of placing the opposition in the hot seat.  

Apparently now our only option is to reenact Monty Python’s version of the Spanish Inquisition. (“Congressman, we have evidence that you lied about your military record, engaged in insider trading and practiced serial bigamy. We have no choice but to subject you to the COMFY PILLOW!”)  

Sarah Palin and others have been scrutinized for using provocative “gun imagery” (say it with the same venomous tone as “kitten bludgeoning imagery” for the proper effect) in campaign material.

Sure, let’s focus on the few hypothetical nut jobs and not on the millions of citizens who see “gun imagery” but don’t take violent action.

Let’s self-censor and “tone down” and mollycoddle and hope that some psycho doesn’t still use the generic phrase “throw the bums out” as a license to push opponents out of an 8th-story window. (And what about deranged fans, who might take rosy descriptions as an invitation to dispatch their idol to a Better Place?)

The squeamish think that tossing around the magic words “esteemed colleague” and “distinguished gentleman” through clenched teeth will make us safer and more productive, as if a bandit’s demanding “Your money or your life—PLEASE” somehow leaves us in better financial shape.

They think that a curtailment of “negative” campaign ads will leave us better informed.

If they get their way, ads will leave the electorate with information such as “Them lollipops, rainbows and pink unicorns sure are purty!”

Pundits have warned that the current level of political discourse turns people off from voting – as if making passionate issues such as abortion, gay rights and illegal immigration boring doesn’t discourage people from voting.

We have been lectured that free speech comes with consequences.

Let’s not forget that neutered speech comes with consequences as well.

Edmund Burke said, “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

Perhaps it’s time to update that to “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to give a wimpy response.”

Danny welcomes reader e-mail responses at tyreetyrades@aol.com.

Read more from:
Comment   Email   Print
Members Opinions:
January 16, 2011 at 7:00am
This is what pisses me off about this country now. No matter where your loyalties lie across the political spectrum, anytime an "event" happens, one side blames the other. What ever happened to common sense. Perhaps this kid was just a nutjob, plain and simple. WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!
January 16, 2011 at 9:28am
A few comments from TIME contributors:

David Gergen: "seize upon it (the killings in Tucson) as a fresh chance to change our culture of violence--too much hate, too many guns, too many killings.

Deepak Chopra: The dark side of our uncivil liberties is violence. Vitriolic words are a form of violence. It is time to pause and reflect.

Tim Pawlenty: All that being said we could all benefit from a more civil and thoughtful discourse.

Ruth Simmons: So my concern is that we tone down the rhetoric, that we cease the incessant vilification of others based on their beliefs. I think it does have a very, very damaging effort on young people.

Jeff Flake: Though many of us have been uncomfortable with the extreme rhetoric of late.

Markos Moulitas Zuniga: When Sarah Palin tells her followers not to retreat but to "reload," when Sharron Angle says people should resort to "2nd Amendment remedies" if they don't get their way at the ballot box...it is only a matter of time before people start getting killed.

"passionate issues such as abortion, gay rights and illegal immigration " and may I add mosque building, should not bring violence and name calling with it. Baby killers, atheist(in a derogatory sense), infidels, queers, immoral and the like, are words that lend themselves to civility.

January 16, 2011 at 11:48am
The only thing I could add here is that just because there is a clear history for verbal dysfunctional rudeness does not imply we should use this history as an excuse to continue conducting ourselves in an uncivil manner.

One side calling out the other on a negative and then having the opposing viewpoint state that in the past the accuser has done it too is a farcical argument to defend your position.

"He was bad - so I can be bad!"

I am hearing this a LOT!

The history lesson was great - Now let's show we can learn from it.
Powered by Bondware
News Publishing Software

The browser you are using is outdated!

You may not be getting all you can out of your browsing experience
and may be open to security risks!

Consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser or choose on below: