Commission approves Hotel/Motel tax
Email Print

Cannon County Commissioners approved a private act creating a 5 percent hotel-motel tax during a lengthy session Saturday.

“Every county that touches Cannon County, with the exception of one, has a hotel-motel tax,” explained Doug Bodary, County Techinical Assistance Service representative. That one county, Coffee, doesn’t have a tax because two cities, Tullahoma and Manchester, already have one.

“We are getting the jump on the city (of Woodbury),” said Commission Chairman Bob Stoetzel.

The recommendation received some opposition initially before it was passed by voice vote.

“I’m not for it. It is putting more burden on a business that’s in its infancy,” said Commissioner Mark Barker.

Commissioner Russell Reed said comparing Cannon County with
its larger, surrounding counties was somewhat misleading. Reed offered a list of 10 counties that were comparable in size to Cannon. Six of them had a hotel-motel tax and four didn’t. The six with the tax were located either on an Interstate or near a lake or state park.

Chamber of Commerce member Thea Prince explained the hotel-motel tax would help the Chamber to bring in more visitors to Cannon County.

“The Chamber is trying to improve our tourism,” Prince said.

All of the proceeds from the tax will go to the Chamber.

Bodary said the tax will probably create only $1,000 to $2,000 in revenues.

Kevin Halpern, representing the Cannon Inn, spoke against the measure.

“We get very few tourists,” Halpern said. Most of the inn’s guests are here for funerals or to attend family
events.

After discussion, Commissioner Kevin George moved for passage of the tax. Clint Higgins seconded. The measure passed with only Commissioner Reed voting no.




Share:
Member Opinions:
By: CoreyD on 1/22/13
I see there is no mention of Doug Bodary resigning as Cannon County CTAS representative due to the allegations that County Executive Mike Gannon was making phone calls telling everyone who would listen that Mr. Bodary was going to run for County Executive in 2014 despite that claim being an absolute lie.

I see there is also no mention of Mr. Gannon's comments to the full commission that he was not "required" to attend any of the commissioner meetings.

How sad that a county official has decided that because they don't want to answer or appear before the commissioners and be responsible for the job they were elected to do and whose salary is paid for by the taxpayer just wants to pout and hold their breath like a three year old!

It is truly time the citizens see and understand the full impact that has on the county as a whole when you have an official who refuses to do the job they were elected to do!


Login and voice your opinion!
Powered by Bondware
Newspaper Software | Email Marketing Service | Website Builder