OPINION: Why Is Morse Code For Controversy?
Email Print

The Cannon County Commission has held two meetings within the space of six days.

At both meetings the main topic of discussion was Faye Morse.

Morse serves as both Cannon County Fire Chief and Cannon County EMA Director.

An item on the agenda for the Commission's Aug. 14 meeting stated:

"Commissioner (Clint) Higgins requests Faye Morse to bring her (EMA) budget before the Commission. Commissioner (Jim) Bush requests the rest of the equipment list from EMA."

No reason was stated as to why Commissioner Higgins had concerns about the EMA budget, or why Commissioner Bush believed the EMA equipment list was incomplete.

Morse addressed each of Commissioner Higgins' budget questions at the meeting, to his apparent satisfaction. Morse told Bush to her knowledge the equipment list was complete, but that if there was something he believed was missing, to let her know. He did not mention anything in specific.

The Commission's concern about the EMA budget and equipment list came out of left field. In the three years I have been covering Commission meetings the budget and equipment of the Emergency Management Agency has never been the topic of discussion outside regular budget meetings, and has not been the cause of any apparent concern.

During the Aug. 14 discussion the topic turned from the EMA to the position of County Fire Chief. Commissioner Bush whipped out a piece of paper and passed it around. The information on the paper, from a person with the State Fire Marshal's Office, stated that Morse was no longer certified to be the county's fire chief because she had not completed some required training.

A lack of certification meant that the county volunteer fire department was no longer recognized by the state, that the families of firefighters were not eligible for death benefits, the county fire department could not received government funding, and could not hold fundraisers.

This information was sent by a state official to a member of the Commission's Fire Board. I do not know when Bush received it. I do know that it appears this potential serious situation was not brought to the attention of the commission nor the public for almost three weeks after it was received. A person or persons sat on it until a commission meeting.

That's inexcusable. Why in the world would someone wait to address such a serious problem? The only reasonable conclusion is that they were more concerned about ambushing Morse than they were the coverage of the fire department.

The state has since admitted the information sent about Morse's and the conuty's certification were an error on its part.

No information has been brought forward by any commissioner to date giving any indication as to why Morse should not hold either position, yet she was asked to resign as fire chief during an "emergency meeting" Monday night.

There have been no allegations or evidence presented of misconduct by Morse. She was not been accused of abusing the public trust, misappropriating funds or county equipment, or of being negligent in her duties.

So why does it seem the Cannon County Commission is all of a sudden on a crusade against Morse?

No member of the commission has answered that question, at least not in a public forum.

As of now it may not be possible to determine who appointed Morse as county fire chief or when it happened. However, it is documented that the state has recognized her as the county fire chief for about a month shy of 14 years, and because of that the county volunteer fire department has been certified by the state all of that time. The certification is currently in effect through 2015.

Despite that, some members of the commission want to see her out of the position. The implication is that she is the cause of controversy, but the ones who have created the controversy are some members of the commission.

Several people approached me today wondering why the commission was on a "witch hunt" against Morse. My reply was that I had no idea, because no reason has been stated by any commissioner.

Clearly it's time for those commissioners who want to see her removed as county fire chief put up, or shut up.

Share:
Members Opinions:
August 21, 2012 at 6:26pm
Thanks Kevin for attempting to express what is happening with the County Fire Chief controversy. This answered a few of the questions I posted on another story of the same subject. Still, there are other questions that need to be addressed by those in government who seem bent on creating the controversy. Is there a scandal yet to be revealed or is this county politics as usual?
August 22, 2012 at 7:38am
The equipment list was never met. When she first turn the list in she told the commissioners that the list was not completed that she had a family member sick. At the next she says its completed.
August 22, 2012 at 8:06am
If they are going to ask her to resign they need to state cause more than "cause of controversy". Maybe they know something we don't, but if they do, they need to share with the rest of us. Morse deserves to know what she's accused of as do the public which she serves, and "causing controversy" isn't justifiable cause for removal unless it interferes with her job duties, that just comes along with dealing with the political arena. If she misappropriated funds or misused publicly funded equipment that's another matter, so as Kevin has said time to put up or shut up.
[Delete]
August 22, 2012 at 9:11am
I don't know. This worked for the election commission when they wanted to get rid of Louise Mayo. All they had to do was say she had created a hostile work environment and poof!!!! she just vanished, went away. That's the problem. Too many people throw around allegations but offer no cause or proof. This is when it becomes political.
August 22, 2012 at 11:57am
KEVIN YOU MADE ONE STATEMENT THAT THE COUNTY COMMISSION IS ALL OF THE SUDDEN ON A CRUSADE AGAINST MORSE. ARE YOU SPEAKING FOR ALL THE COMMISSIONERS OR PART. BE MORE SPECIFICE.
[Delete]
August 22, 2012 at 12:54pm

I'm not speaking for any commissioner. Some of them do more listening than speaking during most commission meetings, so it is difficult for me or anyone else to assess their thoughts on any topic of discussion. Those who spoke the most during the two most recent meetings were, in alphabetical order, Mark Barker, Jim Bush, Kevin George, Clint Higgins, Russell Reed and Bob Stoetzel. I am not saying all of them are on a crusade against Morse. However, some members of the public who have spoken to me the past two days are of the impression the commission is against Morse, and have inquired of me as to why.
August 22, 2012 at 1:10pm
Some folks need to engage their brains before accelerating their pieholes. Since Mrs. Morse has been holding this position for 14 yrs., a lot of legislation has passed including educational requirements to hold these positions. As far as I know there aren't too many college graduates with many hours of specialized training that will take these positions with little or no salary. After attending a few of the past budget meetings, I don't think the county can afford to drive this woman out of office, without first proving, yes proving means having proof, of wrongdoing.
August 22, 2012 at 2:34pm
As I bludgeoned to death on the meat plant article..."more information is needed". We don't have that and until that is presented, it isn't fair or efficient to remove Mrs. Morse.

Powered by Bondware
News Publishing Software

The browser you are using is outdated!

You may not be getting all you can out of your browsing experience
and may be open to security risks!

Consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser or choose on below: